[ad_1]
Late final 12 months Mötley Crüe drummer Tommy Lee discovered himself the defendant in a sexual assault lawsuit filed by a Jane Doe towards him. In that swimsuit, the lady in query claimed that in a shared 2003 helicopter trip collectively, Lee started “forcibly groping, kissing and penetrating her together with his fingers, and trying to drive her to carry out oral copulation” on him amid a shared non-public flight.”
The girl claimed to have been ‘lured’ onto the flight by pilot David Martz, with out her data that Lee would even be onboard. The girl additionally claimed that Lee and Martz freely engaged in alcohol, weed and cocaine mid-flight amid the aforementioned incident. Martz handed away in a aircraft crash again in 2015.
Los Angeles County Superior Court docket Choose Holly J. Fujie dismissed that swimsuit as we speak, Could 06th. Rolling Stone report that the decide didn’t really feel there was sufficient supporting proof to listen to the case within the nature it was filed. Provided that the usual statute of limitations had lapsed on the alleged sufferer’s claims, the swimsuit was filed beneath the Sexual Abuse and Cowl Up Accountability Act.
That is the place the case ran right into a snag, because the decide agreed with Lee‘s protection staff in that there was not sufficient supporting proof submitted which confirmed {that a} “authorized entity” was concerned in protecting up the alleged sexual assault — a necessity for the aforementioned act to be utilized. The plaintiff alleges that Lee‘s Mayhem Touring, Inc. was an operable entity on the time, although Lee claims it was suspended throughout the timeframe of the alleged incident.
This dismissal was accomplished so with out prejudice, with the decide giving the plaintiff a 20-day window to amend their grievance with revised supporting proof for the case to doubtlessly transfer ahead.
You could find extra on the case and this newest improvement over at Rolling Stone.
[ad_2]
